
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Reissues are always controversial in vinyl-collecting circles. The true purist never buys reissued records (or such is the rhetoric). But of course, unless you've got a nearly unlimited budget, there are some records you simply won't be able to own without compromising your principles a little. So, where do you draw the line?
When I first started making a serious effort to collect vinyl - about six years ago, when I was 18 - I happened across this Sun Ra LP [Fig. 1] for $10. I knew enough to know that this is a relatively obscure LP that is very difficult indeed to find, but I didn't know that such records were available as reissues. I quickly put two and two together, but I bought the record anyway - it's a classic.
I didn't think any more of it until I showed the record to a friend, who's very much a purist. He scoffed - he'd never buy a reissue, much less a brand new, sealed reissue like the one I had. For some reason, the new, sealed reissue is at the bottom of the totem pole. Let it get beat up and scratched a little, sell it for half the price, and it's suddenly OK. Don't ask me why.
Anyway, I was crushed. For months, I avoided sealed reissues like the plague, though I still bought used reissues from the 70s and 80s. Every time I came across a sealed reissue, I thought about this exchange. Eventually I came to the conclusion that it made very little sense. I was limiting the scope of my music library for no reason. So, I began buying sealed reissues in certain cases.
Each collector has slightly different rules on this matter. Here are mine:
The bottom line is that I try not to buy reissues when an original isn't totally out of my price range. Part of the mystique of the LP is its individual history: if you buy a used record, you can think about all the hands it passed through to get to you. I'll pay a little more for that special feeling.
You'll often find a used reissue from 10 or 20 years ago, or whatever, that's less than a new, sealed reissue. I always buy these if I can't afford the original. I'm more interested in the mystique of the used record than I am in the shiny new cover of a sealed copy.
UPDATE
Two more important considerations (thanks Dennis):
Of course, sometimes you'll find a drastically undervalued original in a thrift store and get your hands on a real gem that you couldn't afford otherwise. So, do your homework, and keep on digging!
Cross-posted from ListenInMusic.com.
Read more articles in the "Diggin' the Crates" series.
© 2008 Evan Mix for Listen In. Some rights reserved.
So how do you tell a reissue from the first pressing?
I tend to not care about first pressings vs. re-releases at all. I do like the feel of old record jackets, but as long as the record is in good shape I don't really care how new or old it is. Used records are cheaper, but if I come across a new one that I can afford I won't hold out for a used one.
I like how records sound, and that's why I buy them. I'm not a collector, really. I also never leave toys in their original packaging.
The only thing that gives me pause are re-releases. I might buy them, but if I later come upon the original release if I like the record enough I'd by that too since on a lot of re-releases the songs are remastered and/or come with additional tracks. If I like a record enough I will put a premium on having an original version of it. If that makes sense.
A couple of big reasons.
First, the vinyl itself. An older album, like the Sun Ra disc above, would originally be released on polyvinyl chloride, that is, real vinyl. Reissues, on the other hand, are probably going to be polystyrene. Though polystyrene still gives you a sound that is superior to CD, it's doesn't hold a candle to PVC.
Second, the remastering process. Somewhere in the small print of the liner notes, on almost all reissues, you'll find AAD. Analog to analog to digital. So what you're actually getting is digital sound pressed on a record - you might as well buy the CD, unless the coverart and liner notes are enough for you to justify the purchase.
a lot of reissues these days - the sort I buy, anyway - are being pressed on 180 gram vinyl, which I'm almost certain (please correct me if I'm wrong) is real vinyl.
Cool. There are some independents and artist-owned labels who never stopped using real vinyl - Zappa's Barking Pumpkin comes to mind, but they are in the minority. Most of the vinyl you'll run across... well, isn't.
Go grab a disc from the 50's and you'll see a huge difference right away. If you were to hit someone over the head with one of those things you'd probably kill them.
You're a real audiophile, eh Dennis? I never knew. Good on ya.
Oh yeah, bigtime. But hell, even I ended up going with the flow when it cames to CDs. I resisted it for a long, long time, but there was just too much music I couldn't get in any other format, so I eventually gave in. Still, vinyl wherever possible, CD otherwise. I've never bought a (pre-recorded) tape, and I'll never own any kind of MP3 player.
Unfortunately the vinyl is still in the States.
Aaaargh.
Lack of funds, unfortunately.
Shipping is expensive to this part of the world.
Cool. Glad I could help.
Vinyl is so much fun to collect - the real fun comes in the hunt for a great used record. @of the best stores I have ever been to are Bills Records and Tapes in the Dallas area (my mind goes numb from all the shelves after shelves of records in there) and Love Garden Music in Lawrence, KS. I have a small collections - mostly Bealtes that my Dad had and passed on and the rest from Artists that still issue on vinyl for collectors (yeah Wilco!!!!!)
Love Garden is a great store. The folks who work there are (mostly) friendly and knowledgable. Plus the supply of used vinyl is consistently strong, drawing, I bet, from continually retiring KU faculty!
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |